blog:2023-03-06
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:2023-03-06 [2023/03/07 06:32] – pzhou | blog:2023-03-06 [2023/06/25 15:53] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
On the other hand, we can pass to the open neighborhood of the Legendrian. This is GPS restriction of sheaf. On the co-core level, we have the co-variant inclusion, so we have $A_0 \to A$, where $A_0$ is the endormorphisms of cocores inside the small guy, and $A$ is the endomorphism of cocore in the big guy. And, we get $A-mod \to A_0-mod$, hence ** the functor induces map on moduli space **. | On the other hand, we can pass to the open neighborhood of the Legendrian. This is GPS restriction of sheaf. On the co-core level, we have the co-variant inclusion, so we have $A_0 \to A$, where $A_0$ is the endormorphisms of cocores inside the small guy, and $A$ is the endomorphism of cocore in the big guy. And, we get $A-mod \to A_0-mod$, hence ** the functor induces map on moduli space **. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let's be concrete, suppose we are in $S^5$. The augmentation variety is certainly very complicated, | ||
+ | |||
+ | How does Legendrian weave mutation work? Let's think globally first. These are explained in Schrader-Shen-Zaslow. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, what do I want? These boundaries of Legendrian disks labels generators in the Lagrangian disks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In terms of coordinates on local system on the Legendrian surface, these X variables are the holonomy of the $\C^*$ local systems. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The paper of SSZ is so rich in details, it is hard to read. (but great!) read section 4.2, which is about quantization, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Read section 7.2 of Casal-Zaslow. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Read Thm5.13 in STWZ. Why we have classical mutation formula? Where does bipartite graph come from? | ||
+ | |||
+ | very much confused. even if we have a non-exact lagrangian with Legendrian ends, what can you say. | ||
+ | |||
+ | where does classical cluster transformation come from? What does it mean? It tells you which local system go to which local system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why? Quantum torus is about U(1)-skein. Can we do skein-quantum torus? Basically, from a genus $g$ surface. Previously we had 2g cycles, hence a $2g$-dimensional complex torus. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
blog/2023-03-06.1678170729.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/25 15:53 (external edit)