blog:2023-03-22
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:2023-03-22 [2023/03/23 08:52] – pzhou | blog:2023-03-22 [2023/06/25 15:53] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
No, not fine. I want something not like this. I want to say, my skeleton is $B$. And then I made an infinitesimal, | No, not fine. I want something not like this. I want to say, my skeleton is $B$. And then I made an infinitesimal, | ||
- | I want to change my Liouville form only locally. How should I change my $\varphi$ (which was previously just $\rho^2$.) What if I add to $\varphi$, a compactly supported function $\eta(r)$, | + | I want to change my Liouville form only locally. How should I change my $\varphi$ (which was previously just $\rho^2$.) What if I add to $\varphi$, a compactly supported function $\eta( r)$, |
- | OK, this is actually pretty good. Let $\eta \in [-1,1], \phi \in [0, 2\pi]$, and we consider $\epsilon e^{\eta + i \phi}$, framing the $\epsilon$-scale annuli. | + | OK, this is actually pretty good. Let $\eta \in [-R,R], \phi \in [0, 2\pi]$, and we consider $\epsilon e^{\eta + i \phi}$, framing the $\epsilon$-scale annuli. |
+ | |||
+ | Say you used to have $\omega = dx dy$, now you need to change it to $(1 + F(r)) dx dy$. You previously have $\lambda = y dx$, now you need to change it to $F(r) r dr d \theta = d ( G(r) d \theta) $ where $G(r) d \theta$ is a well-defined 1-form. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | OK, I think this can be done in a local way. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 2 dim ==== | ||
+ | Of course, the simplest way is to do a product. What's the local model? $\R^2$, $T^*\R^2$. What's the local model? Cylinder with two stops at one end. The neighborhood and thickening is nice. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | What happens, if you have 3 lines come together? Is there some parameter? I don't think so. Here is the reason. You can define skeleton basically by erecting a conormal, then put a lollipop at the end. There is no ambiguity at putting a lollipop. And if you have several such lollipop, these lollipops are disjoint. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== non-unimodular case? quotient? ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | How to describe the upstair space $(t-1)^2 = uv$, and $(t-1) = (uv)^2$, and $t^2 - 1 = uv$? Maybe the first one is more serious. You can deform it, to $(t-1)(t-1-\epsilon)=uv$, | ||
+ | |||
+ | suppose we have several copies of this space, and we want to do multiplicative reduction, what do we do? We | ||
+ | consider certain product, like $t_1 t_2 t_3^2 = b$ (say we want to do weighted proj space), and then we quotient out the fiber by something. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Downstairs space, what do we do with the quotient step? | ||
blog/2023-03-22.1679561520.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/25 15:53 (external edit)