Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- blog:2023-04-22 [2023/04/22 11:19] – pzhou
+++ blog:2023-04-22 [2023/06/25 15:53] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Now, here are the problems
-==== 1 ====
+==== Major Issues ====
+=== 1 ===
 Where is the key estimate
 $$ SS(\pi_* Sh(\La_B)) \In \pi_*(SS(Sh(\La_B)) $$
@@ Line 28: / Line 30: @@
 Not a big deal :)
-==== 2 ====
+=== 2 ===
 Aha, classically generate means the smallest stable subcategories that contains these object.
@@ Line 36: / Line 38: @@
 ok,this is already on p22.
+=== 3 ===
+Not a big deal, just need to add: because in this grid stratified case, singular support can be estimated easily.
+==== Minor Issues ====
+. I really need to be precise! ahh. being complained. so, let me be more precise. Constructible sheaf with stratification $S$ is related to Lagrangians with singular support $\Lambda_S$.
+. yes, Segal introduced this notion.
+. better reference habit, give precise reference. Yes, we understand you are lazy, but please don't be lazy.
+. give reference to the later introduced FLTZ skeleton.
+. indeed, the notion of partially wrapped CCC is new. let me think how to recover that. I think this is best done by this: starting from the equivariant CCC, then on the B-side, we de-equivariantize on a subgroup, meaning we forget the equivariant structure.
+...
+. yes, forward reference about symplectic reduction should be given.
+.