blog:2023-04-28
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:2023-04-28 [2023/04/29 06:13] – [notes on dimer] pzhou | blog:2023-04-28 [2023/06/25 15:53] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
$$ Y = \{uv = P(z,w) = \sum_{\alpha \in Q_\Sigma} c_\alpha z^\alpha \} $$ | $$ Y = \{uv = P(z,w) = \sum_{\alpha \in Q_\Sigma} c_\alpha z^\alpha \} $$ | ||
So, $Y$ is not toric. Why we want to consider the conic fibration over this ' | So, $Y$ is not toric. Why we want to consider the conic fibration over this ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Question: how does this compare with the usual toric mirror symmetry? where the other side is $(\C^*)^3$ with a superpotential? | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, consider one-dimensional lower case, where $W_Y = u(1+z)$ and $X=\C^2$. If we follow the weird mirror construction, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Right, so the relation with the usual superpotential is that, we take $uv = 1+z$, the space as is, but we fiber it to $W = u = (1+z)/v$. So, $z$ can be whatever $\C^*$ it wants, that's fine. $v$ can be also whatever $\C^*$-it wants, that's fine. Then, $u$ can be solve. So the Hori-Vafa-Givental mirror can be embedded to this space. For each value of non-zero $u$, the open part does not capture the divisor that $v=0$ and $z=-1$. For the part that $u=0$, the HVG space is $v \in \C^*, z=-1$, but there is more, which is $v=0$ and $z=-1$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, how to make it work? Consider the original HVG space, $\C^*_z \times \C^*_v$, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
blog/2023-04-28.1682748835.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/25 15:53 (external edit)