Peng Zhou

stream of notes

User Tools

Site Tools


blog:2023-05-07

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
blog:2023-05-07 [2023/05/07 17:08] – created pzhoublog:2023-05-07 [2023/06/25 15:53] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== 2023-05-07 Sun ====== ====== 2023-05-07 Sun ======
   * SBim, character sheaves, mixed geometry   * SBim, character sheaves, mixed geometry
 +  * some Weinstein and Contact geometry from this HDHF paper. 
  
 ===== sheaves on $B \backslash G / B$ ===== ===== sheaves on $B \backslash G / B$ =====
Line 8: Line 9:
   * paper by Ho-Li on HOMFLY-PT and Hilb on $\C^2$: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.01306.pdf   * paper by Ho-Li on HOMFLY-PT and Hilb on $\C^2$: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.01306.pdf
   * paper by Gorsky-Hogencamp-Wedrich, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.06110.pdf   * paper by Gorsky-Hogencamp-Wedrich, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.06110.pdf
 +  * paper by Oblomkov-Rozansky, about matrix factorization, B-model realization of the Hecke category. 
  
 +===== Signs and Orientations =====
 +  * we choose orientation for each strands in each Lagrangians. 
 +  * I don't know what is a relative spin structure. 
 +  * something about capping for each intersection. 
  
 +Their Lagrangians are union of spheres. They want a trivial $\R$ bundle on the space, so that the direct sum of $\R$ with the tangent bundle is trivial. (well, sometimes, a bundle is stably trivial, you just need to give it more rooms). 
  
 +We choose trivialization $t$ and $t'$ for the two 'augmented' Lagrangian (are they jet bundle?). 
  
 +A capping Lagrangian path in the **oriented** Lagrangians Grassmannian. (so, do I choose orientation of my Lagrangians? I guess I did, since I have trivializations, and I can substract that trivial line bundle.)
 +
 +A stable capping trivialization is a trivialization of the capping path $L_{p,t} \oplus \R$, that interpolate the original trivializations on the two strands. 
 +
 +OK, these are the data. How do I provides orientation for the moduli spaces then? 
 +
 +
 +We map the upper half-plane to the target space. actually, it is a constant map (what?) to $p$, and we consider the trivial vector bundle $\pi_p^*(T_p M)$. We define the Cauchy-Riemann tuple. $\xi, \eta, D$
 +  * $\xi$ is the symplectic constant vector bundle over $H$. 
 +  * on the boundary $\d H$, we segment it into $(-\infty, 0), (0,1), (1,\infty)$, and we put the **oriented** Lagrangian sub-bundle $\eta$ over $\d H$. 
 +  * A Cauchy-Riemann operator, that takes as input a section in the symplectic bundle $\xi$, and output its dbar derivative? OK, I am not sure. 
 +
 +well, a determinant line is a kernel minus cokernel, taking determinants. 
 +
 +===== What is orientation? =====
 +If $L$ satisfies certain topological condition, then the moduli space of disks ending on $L$ is orientable. 
 +
 +But, how do we define the A-infinity structures? Why we count some disks with a negative sign? When we say we orient the 0-dim moduli space of the disks, that means plus-minus signs. 
  
  
blog/2023-05-07.1683479305.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/25 15:53 (external edit)