Peng Zhou

stream of notes

User Tools

Site Tools


blog:2023-06-21

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
blog:2023-06-21 [2023/06/21 18:07] – [The Geometry of Coulomb branch] pzhoublog:2023-06-21 [2023/06/25 15:53] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 ===== The need to talk ===== ===== The need to talk =====
 +  * ZS, LhS, SyB, CyM, BG, JH, PY, CE, MM, BhF, YfS, MH, PhL, XJ, EZaz, DNad
 +  * RB, BW, BE, YL, MKap, MKon
  
  
Line 16: Line 18:
   * We want to understand the fiber of the algebraic integrable system. There are two tricks   * We want to understand the fiber of the algebraic integrable system. There are two tricks
     * abelianization, we write the Coulomb branch as cotangent bundle of the dual Cartan torus mod Weyl     * abelianization, we write the Coulomb branch as cotangent bundle of the dual Cartan torus mod Weyl
-    * compactification, we glue two copies, and do affinization. +    * add matter, we glue two copies, and do affinization.  
 + 
 +==== abelian story ==== 
 +This is supposed to be trivial, but I still don't understand it.  
 + 
 +Consider $G=GL_1(\C)$, $V=\C$, standard representation.  
 +  * what physicis say about $M_C(G,V)$? some principal $G$-bundle and connection, some associated bundle. minimization of some field configuration, that suppose to be the vacuum, no? Start again. Consider the path integral, over this gigantic space of field configuration, all possible kind. Trouble is, we don't know the integration measure. (we don't? even for the Euclidean signature? don't we have Gaussian integral after the Wick rotation?) What's the physical story? (STILL DON'T KNOW....) 
 +  * What BFN says, again some principal $G$-bundle
  
  
blog/2023-06-21.1687370854.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/06/25 15:53 (external edit)