Peng Zhou

stream of notes

User Tools

Site Tools


blog:2023-07-25

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
blog:2023-07-25 [2023/07/25 22:35] – [More on this] pzhoublog:2023-07-25 [2023/07/25 23:48] (current) pzhou
Line 47: Line 47:
 OK, so what? You have some finite group acting on the coordinate ring of the torus. You take invariant.  OK, so what? You have some finite group acting on the coordinate ring of the torus. You take invariant. 
  
 +So, what is this? Well, I think the best way is not to quotient, but remember the action. 
 +
 +So, what is the answer, for $G = PGL_n$? The answer for K-Coulomb? What is the naive answer? The base should be still $K^{G}(pt)$. Well, we have $T_{sc} / W$. That is $\prod_{k=1}^{n-1} \C_k$, with $\mu_n$ acting with different powers (indicated in the lower indices).
 +
 +BFM says it is $ T_{sc} \times T_{ad} / W$, fibered to the base $T_{ad}/W$. 
 +
 +What is $B_G^{G^\vee}$. So, if $G=PGL_2$ and $G^\vee = SL_2$, you have the quotient torus $T_{ad}$ and subtorus $T_{sc}$. Then, the root is like $u=x_1/x_2$ on $T_{ad}$, and on $T_{sc}$, it is like $x_1/x_2=x_1^2 = z^2$. So, we have
 +$$ \C[u^{\pm 1}, z^{\pm 1}, \frac{z^2-1}{u-1}]^{S_2} $$
 +Look, what happens when $u=-1$, and $z=\pm 1$? These are also fixed points of $W$, but there is no blow-up to resolve it. 
 +
 +but why is $u=-1$ also a fixed point? That is a fake one. 
  
  
  
blog/2023-07-25.1690324516.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/07/25 22:35 by pzhou