This is an old revision of the document!
−Table of Contents
2023-07-30
- abelian with matter is the trouble
Coulomb branches
Compare with pure abelian gauge theory, the Coulomb branch of general cases needs two direction modifications, with matter representations, and with non-abelian gauge group.
In the abelian case, how do we deal with matter? We specify the multiplication table for the 'monopole operators', a vector space basis over the base coefficient ring. It is a bit brutal force.
How do we do the affine blow-up? Well, you pick two hypersurfaces in the total space, you blow-up their intersections, then remove the proper transform of one divisor.
For example, just type quiver. We need to first do the abelian case, we have OK, not too bad. Then, we do the blow-up. For each , we consider and . You would complain, why not use and ? Then I would say, they cut-out the same loci. If you ask, 'why not choose ?' then I would say, they are isomorphic. Hold on, so this is it? We have this matter induced relation, and we introduce these for the blow-up coordinates? Yes, I guess so. Affine space, check; dimension is right, check; desired behavior over the smooth part of the descriminant loci, check. Then, that is it.
This gives me hope that things might not be so hard. Consider . OK, now we need to abelianize, so we introduce
Well, here is the trouble, remember the case for ? Or the simpler one ? If you go by the rule of , then you lose. You know what this is suppose to be. You need more generators and relations. You need the and . Then you are in good shape. In general, you need to take a good size of blobs of weights, and do those generators, and get those relations.
Then, when you do blow-up, you can do the simple things.
Steve Jobs
“... Apple at the core -- its core value-- is that we believe that people with passion can change the world for the better. ”
“... And that those people that are crazy enough to think that they can change the world are the ones that actually do. ...”