blog:2024-09-08
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| blog:2024-09-08 [2024/09/09 05:26] – pzhou | blog:2024-09-08 [2024/09/10 16:38] (current) – pzhou | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== 2024-09-08 ====== | ====== 2024-09-08 ====== | ||
| Let's summarize what can be written. | Let's summarize what can be written. | ||
| - | | + | -HMS for K-theoretic Coulomb branches |
| - | - 'HMS' where both sides are K-theoretic Coulomb branches | + | |
| + | ===== HMS for K-theoretic Coulomb branches ===== | ||
| + | basically we want to prove half, or even less than half (no generation result). | ||
| + | so, this can only be called as, symplectic realization of multiplicative KLRW algebra. | ||
| + | So, what is cKLRW and why is it related to (additive resolved) Coulomb branch? We need to say a few sentences: | ||
| + | * additive resolved Coulomb branch is a symplectic resolution of conic symplectic singularity, | ||
| + | * When Webster did that procedure (char p quantization) for Coulomb branch. If we do it honestly, then we need to consider the convolution algebra of $BFN=map(bubble, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ok, apparently I still don't know the Webster' | ||
| + | |||
| + | But that's not my side. I think I will follow Ginzburg' | ||
| + | |||
| + | It would be nice to just do a summary for the symplectic realization | ||
| + | - finite Hecke algebra, Tian-Yuan-Honda | ||
| + | - affine Hecke algebra (for $GL_n$?) the one with the $S^1 \times \R$, | ||
| + | - double affine Hecke should be on $S^1 \times S^1$. | ||
| + | - this paper: degenerate affine Hecke is Fukaya category of Horizontal Hilb for $\C^* \times \C \to \C$, no superpotential. | ||
| + | - Nil affine Hecke, our last paper, which has potential. | ||
| - | ===== ' | ||
blog/2024-09-08.1725859588.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/09/09 05:26 by pzhou