blog:2024-12-04
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:2024-12-04 [2024/12/05 06:54] – created pzhou | blog:2024-12-04 [2024/12/05 09:51] (current) – [Twisted Sheaves] pzhou | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
If I consider coherent sheaf category as the category of B-branes, then how does it depends on the complexified Kahler parameters? One can either do it in the physical way, reading Witten, Hori etc; or one can do it in the math way, thinking about deformation of the Coh category by gerbes. | If I consider coherent sheaf category as the category of B-branes, then how does it depends on the complexified Kahler parameters? One can either do it in the physical way, reading Witten, Hori etc; or one can do it in the math way, thinking about deformation of the Coh category by gerbes. | ||
+ | ===== Twisted Sheaves ===== | ||
+ | It turns out Andrei Caldararu' | ||
+ | Roughly speaking, twisted sheaf is a bunch of locally defined sheaves (hmm, aren't they already locally defined?), whose gluing function fails the tricycle condition. | ||
+ | Take an element $\alpha \in H^2(X, \mathcal O^*_X)$. What does this mean? I probably need to resolve this sheaf $\mathcal O_X^*$, here is a short exact sequence | ||
+ | $$ 0 \to 2\pi i \Z \to \mathcal O \to \mathcal O^* \to 0 $$ | ||
+ | So, if I do $X=\P^1$, then I don't think I have $H^3(\P^1, \Z)$ or $H^2(\P^1, O)$, so I do not have any non-trivial element in $H^2(X, \mathcal O^*_X)$. | ||
+ | It still might make sense, maybe the trivialness of $\alpha$ corresponds to a locally constant deformation. Just like a flat connection gives zero curvature, but still flat connection is useful. | ||
+ | How to take a sheaf of categories and take the global section? Or given a diagram of categories, how to take the limit? Suppose we are trying to get $Coh(\P^1)$ twisted by a complex number $c$ | ||
+ | $$ Coh(\P^1 \RM \infty ) \xto{res \otimes O(c)} Coh(\C^*) \gets Coh(\P^1 \RM 0) $$ | ||
+ | Now, what is $O(c)$ on $\C^*$? I want to say it is a holomorphic line bundle that does not have any global section (so probably shouldn' | ||
+ | $$(z, \eta) \mapsto (z+ 2\pi i , \eta e^{c z})$$ | ||
+ | Indeed, we have $e^z = y$ (hmm, if $c=1$, I am supposed to still get a trivial bundle) | ||
+ | |||
+ | OK, maybe we use analytic topology on $\C^*$. | ||
blog/2024-12-04.1733381677.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/12/05 06:54 by pzhou