2024-07-23
- Goal: understand Yetter-Drinfeld module, Drinfeld double and then Andy Manion's comment paper
What is YD-module
Let be a Hopf algebra, and is the cat of finite dim rep. Let be such central element, then we have the following rep As written this is a rep H morphism. We may restrict to , and get a linear map This has the potential to be a (right) co-action of on .
To check that this is indeed a co-action, we need to do splitting twice. either we split twice, or the second split is on .
Consider the following example: where is a finite group. Let be given as a -graded -rep, namely , and for , , we have . Note that any rep can be given a trivial -gradation. Now, given another -rep , we can do Now, we need to check that this commute with -action. OK, it does.
Now, we apply this to , where acts on by left multiplication. Then we have Now it is clear that this indeed is a co-action.
Now, we should check that the action is compatible with the co-action. We faces the funny condition: OK, this indeed works. I don't know the general rule for co-product, but at least here, for the co-commutative coproduct, this works.
Let's try taking . Let be given as a -graded -rep. Then -action on is pointwise multiplication. has an interesting co-product, hence has an interesting monoidal structure, basically the grading multiply when they take product. Then, it is naturally true that, is not isomorphic to : the grading won't match. Now comes , say . Say , a rank 1 skyscraper at position , then To have an isomorphism, we need to get for each , an isomorphism , well, this is given by the action of on .
Now, we consider , this is represented as the constant function . We have (constant function is the sum of delta functions). So, we just need to consider what is . Now this will go to . Put these all together, we have We first check that this is a co-action, we can do the comodule-split again, to get Or, we can do the co-mult on to get So they match. Finally, we check the action-coaction compatibility. Somehow, for Hopf algebra, there is also action-coaction compatibility, that involves . Given a element and element , we can and we can do split then combine, somehow we need to split to three parts, and the third part, we want to Now, let's test it out. Take , , then if else . Suppose ,then and where , , . Then, . good, it works. Notice that it matters whether we are working with (left-right) YD module, or left-left YD module.
Now we have seen that this works in the two examples, how do we prove it in general? The funny things is the anti-pode. It is sort like inverse