Peng Zhou

stream of notes

User Tools

Site Tools


blog:2024-07-23

2024-07-23

  • Goal: understand Yetter-Drinfeld module, Drinfeld double and then Andy Manion's comment paper

What is YD-module

Let HH be a Hopf algebra, and Rep(H)Rep(H) is the cat of finite dim rep. Let (Y,φ)(Y, \varphi) be such central element, then we have the following rep φ:HYYH \varphi: H \otimes Y \to Y \otimes H As written this is a rep H morphism. We may restrict to {1}Y \{1\} \otimes Y, and get a linear map τ:YYH. \tau: Y \to Y \otimes H. This has the potential to be a (right) co-action of HH on YY.

To check that this is indeed a co-action, we need to do splitting twice. either we split YY twice, or the second split is on HH.

Consider the following example: H=CGH = \C G where GG is a finite group. Let (Y,φ)(Y, \varphi) be given as a GG-graded GG-rep, namely Y=V=gVgY = V = \oplus_g V_g, and for vgVgv_g \in V_g, hGh \in G, we have hvgVhgh1h \cdot v_g \in V_{h g h^{-1}}. Note that any GG rep can be given a trivial GG-gradation. Now, given another GG-rep WW, we can do φ:WVVW,wvgvggw. \varphi: W \otimes V \to V \otimes W, \quad w \otimes v_g \mapsto v_g \otimes g \cdot w. Now, we need to check that this commute with GG-action. OK, it does.

Now, we apply this to W=HW=H, where GG acts on CG\C G by left multiplication. Then we have τ:VVCG,vgvgg. \tau: V \to V \otimes \C G, \quad v_g \to v_g \otimes g. Now it is clear that this indeed is a co-action.

Now, we should check that the action is compatible with the co-action. We faces the funny condition: τ(hvg)=hvghgh1. \tau(h v_g) = h v_g \otimes h g h^{-1}. OK, this indeed works. I don't know the general rule for co-product, but at least here, for the co-commutative coproduct, this works.

Let's try taking H=O(G)H = O(G). Let (Y,φ)(Y, \varphi) be given as a GG-graded GG-rep. Then O(G)O(G)-action on YY is pointwise multiplication. O(G)O(G) has an interesting co-product, hence VecGVec_G has an interesting monoidal structure, basically the grading multiply when they take product. Then, it is naturally true that, W1W2W_1 \otimes W_2 is not isomorphic to W2W1W_2 \otimes W_1: the grading won't match. Now comes (Y,φ)(Y, \varphi), say Y=V=gVgY = V = \oplus_g V_g. Say W=CδhW = \C \delta_h, a rank 1 skyscraper at position hGh \in G, then (VW)g=Vgh1,(WV)g=Vh1g (V \otimes W)_g = V_{gh^{-1}}, \quad (W \otimes V)_g = V_{h^{-1} g} To have an isomorphism, we need to get for each gg, an isomorphism Vgh1Vh1gV_{gh^{-1}} \to V_{h^{-1} g}, well, this is given by the action of h1h^{-1} on VV.

Now, we consider 1H1 \in H, this is represented as the constant function 1O(G)1 \in O(G). We have 1=hδh1 = \sum_h \delta_h (constant function is the sum of delta functions). So, we just need to consider what is δhvg?\delta_h \otimes v_g \mapsto ?. Now this will go to (hvg)δhVhgh1Hh (h v_g) \otimes \delta_h \in V_{hgh^{-1}} \otimes H_h. Put these all together, we have τ(vg)=h(hvg)δh. \tau(v_g) = \sum_h (h v_g) \otimes \delta_h. We first check that this is a co-action, we can do the comodule-split again, to get (τ1)τ(vg)==h1,h2h2(h1vg)δh2δh1. (\tau \otimes 1) \tau(v_g) = = \sum_{h_1, h_2} h_2 (h_1 v_g) \otimes \delta_{h_2} \otimes \delta_{h_1}. Or, we can do the co-mult on HH to get (1Δ)τ(vg)=h1,h2(h1h2vg)(δh1δh2). (1 \otimes \Delta) \tau(v_g) = \sum_{h_1, h_2} (h_1 h_2 v_g) \otimes (\delta_{h_1} \otimes \delta_{h_2}). So they match. Finally, we check the action-coaction compatibility. Somehow, for Hopf algebra, there is also action-coaction compatibility, that involves SS. Given a HH element hh and VV element vv, we can τ(hv)=(hv)Y(hv)H \tau(h \cdot v) = (hv)_Y \otimes (hv)_H and we can do split then combine, somehow we need to split hh to three parts, and SS the third part, we want to h2v1h3v2S1(h1). h_2 v_1 \otimes h_3 v_2 S^{-1}(h_1). Now, let's test it out. Take h=δhh = \delta_h, v=vgv=v_g, then δhvg=vg\delta_h v_g = v_g if h=gh=g else 00. Suppose h=gh=g,then τ(δgvg)=hhvgδh \tau(\delta_g v_g) = \sum_h h v_g \otimes \delta_h and h2v1h1v2S(h3)=δhgh1(hvg)δh3δhδh11 h_2 v_1 \otimes h_1 v_2 S(h_3) = \delta_{h g h^{-1}} (h v_g) \otimes \delta_{h_3} \delta_{h} \delta_{h_1^{-1}} where h2=hgh1h_2 = h g h^{-1}, h3=hh_3=h, h11=hh_1^{-1} = h. Then, h1h2h3=gh_1 h_2 h_3 = g. good, it works. Notice that it matters whether we are working with (left-right) YD module, or left-left YD module.

Now we have seen that this works in the two examples, how do we prove it in general? The funny things is the anti-pode. It is sort like inverse

blog/2024-07-23.txt · Last modified: 2024/07/23 22:44 by pzhou